Karhu Guide Ski
![]()
It was in January 1978 that Karhu introduced their original XCD ski - it was a marriage of Nordic construction and downhill performance into one ski, the XCD. A ski that subsequently launched a genre of skis for karhu. In celebration of the 30th anniversary of their XCD ski program, Karhu invited a group of skiers to the North Cascades for a couple days of touring on the Guide, the flagship ski from their current XCD ski line.
What is an XCD ski you ask? XCD or cross-country downhill skis are all about versatility, they are a bridge between Nordic kick and glide and downhill-oriented backcountry skis. The Guide, with metal edges and dimensions of 109/78/95, is the most downhill oriented of Karhu's XCD line, but even the Guide includes the Omnitrack NoWax base found on more Nordic oriented skis. The result is a killer touring ski that can handle a huge variety of downhill action.
To prove the Guide's versatility, we skied them up at Washington Pass in the North Cascades using Voile three-pin set-ups with light plastic tele boots from Garmont . A couple folks also tried the Guide with Dynafit binders and Scarpa F3's.
The ski is light and matched with a cableless three-pin binder and light boots, it is a dream up hill. The Omnitrack base is not like using skins but in spring snow conditions the base served us very well going up. Skin tracks are lower angle and there is an art to getting used to what the pattern base offers, but I had no complaints. The base accepts skins like any other ski and you could always set them up that way.
Given its healthy dimensions of 109/78/95, the Guide skis like a modern tele board but tours like tele skis did before the industry and skiers alike decided that bigger was better. I am a big fan of fat skis and good boots, but the Guide is a great blend of modern construction, light weight, and Nordic versatility. Its downhill performance is great, 78mm underfoot is not that skinny, despite the big dimensions we are getting used to. But it is the ski's light weight and the free travel feel of a nowax base and a three-pin binder that harken back to the days of double camber skis when the word telemark was synonymous with touring. The word telemark no longer means touring or backcountry for many people and my standard all mountain tele set-up easily outweighs my Dynafit clad AT rig.
We skied the Guides on terrain that is typically skied in bigger gear. The tours from the hair-pin on Washington Pass offer excellent terrain and the Guides held their own with ease. The Guide is plenty of ski for many adventures and a prime choice when the access is long or the terrain more rolling. Anyone with a freeheel history will appreciate the Guide's versatility and anyone who is new to the XCD category will be surprised at what the ski can handle.





Comments
1. phil said...
I would love to try a pair of the Guides. For long Coast Range tours where you are spending long periods traveling over icecaps, the option of not using skins would be great. We often wax, but that can be tricky at times. The real question I have is how torsionally stiff the skis are and how well they perform skiing icy slopes [all of the reports I've read are skiing powder or spring slush]. Obviously, they are a compromise ski - but I'm curious.
3. John said...
The Guides are finally available locally. I'm not sure about sizing. They are relatively wide (79) but soft. Dave, what did you find when skiing them last season? Did you ski them quite long? I'm debating between the 175 and 185. The 185s just seem so long compared with what I've been skiing the last few years! I'm just not sure if the 175 would be too squirrelly. Any comments from your experience on them?
[I'm a good telemarker (20+ years, instructor) but light (165lb) and shorter (5'9"). May ski with a big pack if they prove good for longer trips...]
4. dave said...
john,
given your size specs and experience level, I think you could handle the 185 without trouble. I ski the 175 but i weigh in at 135. Think back to a few years ago when our primary skis were these dimensions. What length did you ski then? The 175 may be easier in the trees but I think you will get more out of the 185 in more alpine environments. Check the Karhu website at karhuski.com. They actually having a sizing chart, but i believe you fall right in the middle of the 175/185.























2. dave said...
Good question about the torsional stiffness. Overall, i would call it a soft ski. They definitely perform well on firm corn, but given ice i would imagine them to be a bit chattery. They have a nice platform underfoot to edge with but i have not run through a good hard snow day.
5/27/2008